Answers
Every one of these is a question somebody has actually asked. No pitch, no obligation, and nothing here needs an account.
We are IT automation specialists. We find the work in a business that is typed twice, waits on somebody, or is paid to an outside firm to do …
The repeatable part of almost any process. Invoices and orders keyed in from PDFs or email, the same report rebuilt every week, data copied between two systems that …
Start with the savings check: eighteen one-tap questions, about two minutes, and you get a costed manifest as a PDF. Or we look at how work actually moves …
Every change is costed on its own, with what it gives back and how long until it has paid for itself, and the plan is ordered by payback …
Usually not. Most of what we build sits between the systems you already have and moves the work between them, so nobody has to learn a new tool …
We support it round the clock. It tells you when it has run and when it needs a person, so nobody has to remember to check on it, …
Nothing. It is eighteen one-tap questions, about two minutes, and no account. You get a savings manifest as a PDF: what manual work and outsourcing cost you now, …
The first change is deliberately a small one: the piece that can be built in days rather than a programme of work, and the one with the fastest …
No. What we need is somebody who knows how the work actually moves - usually the person doing it, not the person who manages them. Most of what …
The shape of the process matters more than the headcount. If a few people repeat the same steps every week, there is usually something worth automating, and if …
Yes, and we would rather they knew what we had built than found out later. We are usually adding something between systems rather than replacing what somebody already …
Then we say so, before it is built rather than after. Every change is costed on its own with its own payback, so one that does not earn …
It will. A supplier changes an invoice layout, a system gets updated, a process moves. That is the normal life of an automation rather than a fault, and …